- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:30:11 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5347 --- Comment #3 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2008-11-03 21:30:11 --- (In reply to comment #1) If that trust is no longer > well-founded, such that a change in those specs can make existing > implementations non-conformant, then we have to move back to referring to dated > versions. > Actually on further investigation, I don't believe that referencing dated specs will solve the problem. even if you refer to the 4th (or earlier) edition explicitly then its standard header section says that the there may be normative corrections in the errata, and this has _already_ been done. The 4th edition errata http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata Already has published E09 which changes the Name production, so this is already the offical XML syntax whether or not the 5th edition is published. By making this change via the errata system, basically the intention of the XML core WG is to remove choice and force all XML systems to switch (which is explicitly the intent, following the lack of take-up of XML 1.1). David -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 21:30:20 UTC