- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:39:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5393 ------- Comment #7 from frans.englich@telia.com 2008-03-13 12:39 ------- Yes, that makes sense, sorry for the noise. Hopefully I've moved CVS in the correct direction now by adding alternative baselines to doc-available-3, doc-available-4, fn-doc-30 and fn-doc-31 such that doc-available()/doc() are allowed to either accept or flag documents that contains xml:id errors.
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2008 12:40:29 UTC