- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:13:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5810 --- Comment #6 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2008-06-27 16:13:32 --- According to the typing rules in Bug 4841 fs:item-at( fn:error(), Expr) is empty-sequence. as produced by (fn:error()[1]) Is this correct/desirable? Does this match the intended evaluation semantics? This may also affect fn:subsequence. Perhaps these should be defined to be of type none, i.e. erroneous? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 16:22:47 UTC