- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:19:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5810
Summary: [XQuery] reasoning about fn:error()
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Recommendation
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQuery
AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com
ReportedBy: tim@cbcl.co.uk
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
There has been a long discussion in Bug 5795 about fn:error().
Many implementations will happily use lazy evaluation to avoid an error in the
query:
(1, fn:error())[1]
Is it also permissible to avoid an error here:
(fn:error(), 1)[2]
?
Since fn:error has type none, whose quantifier is 1, is it conformant for
count(fn:error())
to return 1?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:20:29 UTC