- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:19:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5810 Summary: [XQuery] reasoning about fn:error() Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Recommendation Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQuery AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com ReportedBy: tim@cbcl.co.uk QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org There has been a long discussion in Bug 5795 about fn:error(). Many implementations will happily use lazy evaluation to avoid an error in the query: (1, fn:error())[1] Is it also permissible to avoid an error here: (fn:error(), 1)[2] ? Since fn:error has type none, whose quantifier is 1, is it conformant for count(fn:error()) to return 1? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:20:29 UTC