http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5223 ------- Comment #5 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-10-30 16:03 ------- (Discussed on 2007-10-30. No clear consensus on what the original intention of the WG was - some thought we intended the untypedAtomic value to be cast to the primitive type, some that we intended it to be cast to the specific type, others that we never gave the question any thought... Will come back to it.)Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 16:04:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:20 UTC