[Bug 4024] ST-WhereExpr001 should not be expected to fail?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4024


frans.englich@telia.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #11 from frans.englich@telia.com  2007-10-01 10:18 -------
I'm closing this report, since ST-WhereExpr001, which tests optional static
typing, was run using a non-static typing implementation(see comment #10).

If this resolution is satisfactory, feel free to change status to CLOSED.
Otherwise reopen this report. If no feedback is given within two weeks, status
will be set to CLOSED.

Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 10:18:12 UTC