W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2007

[Bug 4024] ST-WhereExpr001 should not be expected to fail?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:18:04 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1IcILk-0002uV-0v@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4024


frans.englich@telia.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #11 from frans.englich@telia.com  2007-10-01 10:18 -------
I'm closing this report, since ST-WhereExpr001, which tests optional static
typing, was run using a non-static typing implementation(see comment #10).

If this resolution is satisfactory, feel free to change status to CLOSED.
Otherwise reopen this report. If no feedback is given within two weeks, status
will be set to CLOSED.
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 10:18:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:20 UTC