- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:10:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5267 ------- Comment #3 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2007-11-14 21:10 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > xs:integer is neither a primitive type according to W3C XML Schema 3.2, but > it's probably as well listed all over the specs as primitive. I have a vague > memory of that either XQuery or F&O explicitly said that xs:integer was > considered as a primitive type even though it isn't. You're maybe thinking of F+O section 17.1: "These four types [xs:untypedAtomic, xs:integer, xs:yearMonthDuration, and xs:dayTimeDuration] are not primitive types but they are treated as primitive types in this section." (Although I don't see why xs:untypedAtomic is "not primitive".) > In XQuery 1.0, H Glossary (Non-Normative), section xs:anyAtomicType are > xs:integer and xs:untypedAtomic mentioned as primitive atomics. Similarly in XQuery section 2.5.1, point 5. Getting back to the Data Model spec, section 2.6.2 (under xs:anyAtomicType) also mentions xs:integer as a primitive atomic type.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 21:10:46 UTC