- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 04:40:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4541 ------- Comment #1 from chamberl@almaden.ibm.com 2007-05-14 04:40 ------- I agree that "return do" is not pretty. But I don't think it would be wise to have two forms of FLWOR, one that requires an updating expression and one that requires a non-updating expression. This will get us into trouble later if we allow updating expressions and non-updating expressions to be mixed, as in the XQueryP proposal. I think it is wiser to keep the FLWOR expression fully orthogonal (independent of what kind of expression is in the return clause). Note that this issue (relationship between FLWOR and updating expressions) was discussed at great length at the St. Petersburg meeting of the working group in January 2006. The current design was agreed upon by the working group after considering several proposals. One of the things that slows down our progress is repeatedly revisiting decisions that were made explicitly many months ago. --Don C.
Received on Monday, 14 May 2007 04:40:34 UTC