- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:57:37 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4537 ------- Comment #2 from mrys@microsoft.com 2007-05-11 23:57 ------- A rename could change the name of an attribute to a name that conflicts with an already existing name. The application of upd:applyUpdates() makes sure that this does not happen, but somebody who just reads the section on rename does not see that this check occurs. It would be useful to call it out editorially with a note that such checks will occur when we talk about the operation, and not only burry it deep down in the semantics.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 23:57:42 UTC