- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:25:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4757
Summary: 1.0.3dev:K2-Axes-53
Product: XML Query Test Suite
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XML Query Test Suite
AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
ReportedBy: tim@cbcl.co.uk
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Since the FS spec states in 4.2 Path Expressions that:
[RelativePathExpr / StepExpr]Expr
==
fs:apply-ordering-mode (
fs:distinct-doc-order-or-atomic-sequence (
let $fs:sequence as node()* := [RelativePathExpr]Expr return
let $fs:last := fn:count($fs:sequence) return
for $fs:dot at $fs:position in $fs:sequence return
[StepExpr]Expr
))
shouldn't this always throw a type checking error, because
let $fs:sequence as node()* := (1, 2, 3)[1] return ....
will fail?
(:*******************************************************:)
(: Test: K2-Axes-53 :)
(: Written by: Frans Englich :)
(: Date: 2007-06-14T10:15:26+01:00 :)
(: Purpose: Many atomic values with predicates in a path expression. :)
(:*******************************************************:)
(1, 2, 3)[1]/(1, 2)[last()]/"a string"
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 12:25:32 UTC