- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:16:57 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4733
Summary: [FT] editorial: E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0
and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Full Text
AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0
[1]
"Because XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 integrates seamlessly with
XQuery 1.0"
I would say there's a visible seam where the two join.
Delete "seamlessly".
[2]
'([XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text Requirements], section 4.3,
Composability, states that "XQuery/XPath Full-Text MUST be composable with
XQuery, and SHOULD be composable with itself.")'
This is kind of clunky for a parenthetical remark. Delete it, I think.
[3]
"it follows that the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0
must integrate seamlessly with the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0."
This sentence is saying something like "because this spec satisfies
requirement X, it therefore satisfies requirement Y". Is it the spec's
job to point out how it comes to satisfy its requirements?
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 10:16:58 UTC