- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:16:57 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4733 Summary: [FT] editorial: E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Full Text AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 [1] "Because XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 integrates seamlessly with XQuery 1.0" I would say there's a visible seam where the two join. Delete "seamlessly". [2] '([XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text Requirements], section 4.3, Composability, states that "XQuery/XPath Full-Text MUST be composable with XQuery, and SHOULD be composable with itself.")' This is kind of clunky for a parenthetical remark. Delete it, I think. [3] "it follows that the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 must integrate seamlessly with the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0." This sentence is saying something like "because this spec satisfies requirement X, it therefore satisfies requirement Y". Is it the spec's job to point out how it comes to satisfy its requirements?
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 10:16:58 UTC