- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:59:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4702 Summary: [FT] editorial: 2.3.1 Using Weights Within a Scored FTContainsExpr Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Full Text AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org 2.3.1 Using Weights Within a Scored FTContainsExpr [1] para 1 "Syntactically weight declarations" After "Syntactically", insert a comma. [2] para 2 "The effect of weights on the result score" s/result/resulting/ maybe [3] "However, weight declarations must follow these rules:" Actually, only point #3 (the restriction to 0 - 1000) is a rule for weight declarations to follow. The other two points are rules for the scoring algorithm to follow. [4] "1. Weights in an FTContainsExpr are significant only in relation to each other" [4a] Is it possible to detect if a scoring algorithm breaks this rule? [4b] When you say "in an FTContainsExpr", does that include nested FTContainsExprs? [4c] What should the scoring algorithm do with cases like this?: let score $s := $b/content ftcontains ("web site" weight 0.5) and $b/content ftcontains ("usability" weight 2) (Note two separate FTContainsExprs.) [5] "1. .... to each other; and" s/; and/./ (for consistency with other points)
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 09:59:05 UTC