- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:59:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4702
Summary: [FT] editorial: 2.3.1 Using Weights Within a Scored
FTContainsExpr
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Full Text
AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
2.3.1 Using Weights Within a Scored FTContainsExpr
[1]
para 1
"Syntactically weight declarations"
After "Syntactically", insert a comma.
[2]
para 2
"The effect of weights on the result score"
s/result/resulting/ maybe
[3]
"However, weight declarations must follow these rules:"
Actually, only point #3 (the restriction to 0 - 1000) is a rule for
weight declarations to follow. The other two points are rules for
the scoring algorithm to follow.
[4]
"1. Weights in an FTContainsExpr are significant only in relation to each
other"
[4a]
Is it possible to detect if a scoring algorithm breaks this rule?
[4b]
When you say "in an FTContainsExpr", does that include nested
FTContainsExprs?
[4c]
What should the scoring algorithm do with cases like this?:
let score $s :=
$b/content ftcontains ("web site" weight 0.5)
and
$b/content ftcontains ("usability" weight 2)
(Note two separate FTContainsExprs.)
[5]
"1. .... to each other; and"
s/; and/./ (for consistency with other points)
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 09:59:05 UTC