- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:44:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4446 ------- Comment #8 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2007-06-17 23:44 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > As an example, consider the case that the conditional expression is operand of > the fn:count function, and that both branches consist of function calls whose > signature guarantees exactly one result item. It seems to me that your wording > would permit to rewrite the conditional expression as the expression "1", I think you mean rewrite the fn:count(...) call as 1. > whereas the original proposal would not allow such a rewrite, because it would > amount to returning the result of a branch that has not been selected. But it doesn't amount to evaluating a branch that has not been selected? (I'm not sure it amounts to either, but I don't see how you can say it's one and not the other.)
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2007 23:44:53 UTC