- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:39:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3972 ------- Comment #4 from tim@cbcl.co.uk 2007-06-01 08:39 ------- Masochism, largely. If no one implements it, no one will know if it works. By implementing it, we've found the odd error in the FS spec. Whether or not it's a Good Thing, it should at least be the case that it is correct. Please be assured that our implementation does have an "off" switch for static typing! But by implementing static type checking, we can be sure that we introduce a minimal number of dynamic type checks (for what it's worth).
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 08:39:26 UTC