[Bug 4841] [F&O] [FS] Definition of fn:subsequence in relation to normalization rules for filter expressions in FS

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4841





------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2007-07-09 14:46 -------
It looks to me as if the FS normalization rule in 4.3.2 should apply only to
IntegerLiteral and not to other kinds of NumericLiteral. (Real implementations
can also infer a static type of empty-sequence when the predicate is a constant
numeric value that is non-integer or less than one, but I suspect the FS
doesn't want to do that.)

Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 14:46:10 UTC