W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2006

[Bug 3757] [FS] technical: 2.3.1 ElementValue

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:57:13 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1GTYmf-0005D4-7I@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #3 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org  2006-09-30 06:57 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think there is something wrong with the spec as is

So you don't think the disagreement between definitions and example constitutes
something wrong with the spec?

> Being that late in the process, specific suggested text would be
> greatly appreciated.

Well, you could change "contain a complex value or a simple value" to "contain
a sequence of attribute nodes followed by either a complex value or a simple
value", and drop the attribute stuff from the defn of complex value. Note that
"complex value" isn't used anywhere else, so there isn't a problem with
changing its definition. That should take care of the definition/example

Not sure about the general mapping though.
Received on Saturday, 30 September 2006 06:57:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:15 UTC