W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2006

[Bug 3676] fn:subsequence typeing rules

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:52:23 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1GSEIJ-0008PX-52@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #1 from simeon@us.ibm.com  2006-09-26 14:52 -------

Despite those rules having been checked by many people (See Bugs #2303, #1968,
#1728), I believe you are right that we could and probably should cover '+' as
well as '*'. I don't believe you could do better than prime(Type)? since + only
guarantees there is at least one item.

That said, I don't believe the rules are broken (in the sense of being
inconsistent) so I am not sure what the working groups will want to reconsider
this, considering the late stage of the process.

- Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:02:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:15 UTC