- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:36:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3756 ------- Comment #11 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-09-22 14:36 ------- If any kind of output normalization is deployed it needs to be done in a verifiable and maintainable way. A patch or two can fix some issues that are found by a particular harness driver at this point, but it doesn't help when bugs are fixed and the test suite is potentially further developed in the future. That's why I mention a tool here, such that the task force can guarantee any promises it gives. So, I doubt patches would be accepted. However, I do think the more general ideas behind this surely has it merits and that it should be considered for further development. My best advice is what Michael said; to do string comparisons and in the cases they fail, fallback to c14n comparison(or functional equivalent). This is only my personal response. The task force will discuss and take action on this report.
Received on Friday, 22 September 2006 14:36:48 UTC