- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:39:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3733
Summary: [XPath] reorder rules in Node Comparisons
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XPath
AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com
ReportedBy: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
In http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3699, it was suggested that
bullets 2 and 3 be swapped in section 3.5.3, Node Comparisons. This section now
reads as follows:
"The result of a node comparison is defined by the following rules:
1. The operands of a node comparison are evaluated in implementation-dependent
order.
2. Each operand must be either a single node or an empty sequence; otherwise a
type error is raised [err:XPTY0004].
3. If either operand is an empty sequence, the result of the comparison is an
empty sequence, and the implementation need not evaluate the other operand or
apply the operator. However, an implementation may choose to evaluate the other
operand in order to determine whether it raises an error.
4. ..."
As written, the commentor thought that we might intend that "() is 100" be
required to raise XPTY0004.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 19:39:22 UTC