- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:39:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3733 Summary: [XPath] reorder rules in Node Comparisons Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XPath AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com ReportedBy: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org In http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3699, it was suggested that bullets 2 and 3 be swapped in section 3.5.3, Node Comparisons. This section now reads as follows: "The result of a node comparison is defined by the following rules: 1. The operands of a node comparison are evaluated in implementation-dependent order. 2. Each operand must be either a single node or an empty sequence; otherwise a type error is raised [err:XPTY0004]. 3. If either operand is an empty sequence, the result of the comparison is an empty sequence, and the implementation need not evaluate the other operand or apply the operator. However, an implementation may choose to evaluate the other operand in order to determine whether it raises an error. 4. ..." As written, the commentor thought that we might intend that "() is 100" be required to raise XPTY0004.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 19:39:22 UTC