- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:55:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3731
Summary: version declaration after comment
Product: XML Query Test Suite
Version: 1.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XML Query Test Suite
AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
ReportedBy: per@bothner.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
version_declaration-001.xq is marked as <expected-error>*</expected-error>.
Since I cannot see anything else wrong with the query, I'm assuming this si
because there is a comment before the version declaratiion. This implies that
an XQuery implementation is rquired to reject a version declaration that
follows a comment. But the Specification [4.1] says: "If such a Comment
[before the end of the version declaration] is present, the result is
implementation-dependent." That to me seems to say that an implementation is
*not* requiredto reject this query.
I guess I'm asking for guidance here. Does what does
<expected-error>*</expected-error> mean in this context?
The same applies to version_declaration-002, version_declaration-003,
version_declaration-004, and version_declaration-005.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 13:55:42 UTC