- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:55:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3731 Summary: version declaration after comment Product: XML Query Test Suite Version: 1.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XML Query Test Suite AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com ReportedBy: per@bothner.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org version_declaration-001.xq is marked as <expected-error>*</expected-error>. Since I cannot see anything else wrong with the query, I'm assuming this si because there is a comment before the version declaratiion. This implies that an XQuery implementation is rquired to reject a version declaration that follows a comment. But the Specification [4.1] says: "If such a Comment [before the end of the version declaration] is present, the result is implementation-dependent." That to me seems to say that an implementation is *not* requiredto reject this query. I guess I'm asking for guidance here. Does what does <expected-error>*</expected-error> mean in this context? The same applies to version_declaration-002, version_declaration-003, version_declaration-004, and version_declaration-005.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 13:55:42 UTC