- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:55:10 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3717 ------- Comment #2 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-09-15 09:55 ------- I agree the proposed change is a patch in the traditional sense. However, I think it's a large patch. That is, that most of these problems are caused by cast expressions. I have a hard time understanding relaxing signatures. That static typing decreases usability is a consequence -- a trade off. The point of static typing is to reduce branching/possibilities in the implementation, and relaxing a signature is doing the opposite. I'm not opposed to relaxing fn:dateTime, I just have a hard time understanding it, since it to me seems contradictory to why people wanted static typing in the first place.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 09:55:23 UTC