- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:44:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3697 ------- Comment #3 from tim@cbcl.co.uk 2006-09-14 06:44 ------- That certainly sounds reasonable, although it would be nice for an implementation which follows the Formal Semantics document precisely to be able to pass the tests. Many of the problems we've encountered would go away with the use of fn:exactly-one , fn:zero-or-one, or application of [1] filters. Would such changes 'damage' many tests? So far we've only been testing an XPath 2.0 implementation. We've used XQTS, ignoring those tests which are XQuery-only. That's left about 11000 of the minimal-conformance tests of which we fail about 200, mostly due to the type checking problems we've highlighted. We hope to get a full XQuery implementation ready soon to see how we fair on the remaining tests.
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2006 06:44:33 UTC