- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:16:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3715 Summary: Lack of coverage for static typing feature Product: XML Query Test Suite Version: 1.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XML Query Test Suite AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com ReportedBy: frans.englich@telia.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org The XQTS lacks coverage in several known areas(and probably unknown too), and here is a known one which I haven't written tests for locally: As of this writing there have been a lot of bugs reported on tests that aren't static typing safe. These tests haven't been reported previously despite static typing implementors have been reported other bugs, suggesting that their implementations aren't conformant is this area. I believe an improvement for this lack of coverage is to find all reports kindly reported by tim@cbcl.co.uk and write static typing tests that are similar, but intentionally cases type errors. So, this report can be addressed whenever a pickup-heat is done for XQTS, and new tests are added. That implementors seem to implement static typing so widely, really makes me wonder how useful spec'ing static typing is. (Another area where XQTS could use stronger coverage is regular expressions.) Frans
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 11:16:12 UTC