- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:12:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3486 ------- Comment #12 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-09-13 10:12 ------- But a relative base URI is only an error when the base URI declaration is relative. If the base URI is initialized(by the environment) to be relative, it's accepted and that make the "The resulting absolute URI Reference" claim for fn:doc(and any other assumption on absolute base URI) not hold. Wouldn't it be easier if it just simply was an error if the base URI is relative? It would cover all cases, as I see it. If not, the specs must be edited to not assume the base URI is absolute, as I see it.
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 10:12:30 UTC