- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:22:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3485 ------- Comment #5 from davidc@nag.co.uk 2006-09-12 23:22 ------- I'm happy with the resolution that syntactically a relative uri literal should not be an error, but your message doesn't say what the non error meaning should be, this isn't clear in all cases. As noted in comment 0, the behaviour of relative collation URI are already specified (resolve against the base uri in the static context) This should also probably be the behaviour in other cases (eg module and schema import) However in namespace declarations relative URI should probably still be an error (although you may want to make it just optional that the error is reported which is probably the original reason for the current text in 2.4.5) w3c policy being that relative namespace uri are evil and specs should not assign meaning to them) specifying a relative base uri (using the prolog declaration or xml:base) is another tricky case that has its own entry, bug #3486 David
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 23:22:25 UTC