- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:23:48 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3686 ------- Comment #5 from mrys@microsoft.com 2006-09-08 17:23 ------- I was arguing in favor of relaxing the argument types to make them composable. But examples as the one given is of a lesser concern since xs:string("This is a characte") is bad coding style. Our static typing implementation actually relaxes the argument types of these built-in functions to allow (). We should either do that change for at least static implementations - or if no consensus can be reached, we should allow static typing implementation to error on the test.
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 17:23:55 UTC