- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:42:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3486
frans.englich@telia.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |frans.englich@telia.com
------- Comment #10 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-09-04 18:42 -------
Just mentioning that I've also independently run into the problem of relative
xml:base attributes in direct and computed constructors, which the proposed
solution "Part 2: xml:base" in comment #3 solves in my opinion as well.
(The XQTS is missing tests for these scenarios; relative xml:base attributes in
"top" constructors. Tests for the differences compared to XML/XSL-T as David
describes is needed as well.)
Frans
Received on Monday, 4 September 2006 18:43:04 UTC