W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2006

[Bug 4024] ST-WhereExpr001 should not be expected to fail?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:24:05 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1GozC9-0000Iv-1i@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4024





------- Comment #4 from mike@saxonica.com  2006-11-28 09:24 -------
>True, but that is because the static typing rules for fn:boolean do not match
the informal description in "Functions and Operators". 

I don't understand this comment. Section 15.1.1 in F+O doesn't attempt to
describe the static typing rules for fn:boolean, even informally. It explicitly
states that the static typing rules are to be found in the Formal Semantics
document.
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 09:24:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:16 UTC