- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:56:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3849 hrennau@yahoo.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #5 from hrennau@yahoo.de 2006-11-17 09:56 ------- Don and working group members, thank you for considering my report and the associated comments. I accept the decision (with a sigh) and close this bug report. But one afterword. In the meantime I checked eight implementations which claim to conform to XQuery candidate recommendation of Nov 2005, or later. As a test case I used the example in this bug report. Result: one pass (Saxon), seven failures; among the failures, two implementations in fact implemented the semantic alternative discussed in this bug report. (A surprise to me.) It is a pity that presently the copy namespaces mode is a dark corner of XQuery, as far as implementations are concerned, already not speaking of textbooks.
Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 09:56:29 UTC