- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:56:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3849
hrennau@yahoo.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Comment #5 from hrennau@yahoo.de 2006-11-17 09:56 -------
Don and working group members,
thank you for considering my report and the associated comments. I accept the
decision (with a sigh) and close this bug report.
But one afterword. In the meantime I checked eight implementations which claim
to conform to XQuery candidate recommendation of Nov 2005, or later. As a test
case I used the example in this bug report. Result: one pass (Saxon), seven
failures; among the failures, two implementations in fact implemented the
semantic alternative discussed in this bug report. (A surprise to me.) It is a
pity that presently the copy namespaces mode is a dark corner of XQuery, as far
as implementations are concerned, already not speaking of textbooks.
Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 09:56:29 UTC