- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:07:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3960 ------- Comment #3 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-11-09 10:07 ------- For some reason that I've never understood, but that has caused untold confusion ever since, the authors of the Namespaces Rec went out of their way to insist that what we sometimes call the "null namespace" and what you call the "empty namespace" or "no namespace" is not in fact a namespace. So when you read a phrase like "for each namespace..." it doesn't include the null|empty|no|absent namespace, because that isn't a namespace. No prefix is ever bound to this non-namespace; no namespace binding or namespace node ever references it. Declarations like xmlns="" and in XML 1.1, xmlns:p="" terminate a binding, they do not create a new one.
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 10:08:06 UTC