- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:40:39 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3959 ------- Comment #4 from vano_msu@mail.ru 2006-11-08 15:40 ------- The extent to which an implementation validates the lexical form of xs:anyURI is implementation dependent. I think, it means that if our implementation is strict then we must raise FORG0001 in this test case. I don't insist on making FORG0001 as one possible alternative. But It seems to me that FORG0001 should be allowed as expected result. If our goal to create non-strict fn:base-uri why we couldn't return xs:string, not xs:anyURI? P.S. Moreover, percent-encoded URI in this test case is not correct URI too according to RFC 2616.
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 15:40:48 UTC