[Bug 3841] Static typing of function declarations

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3841





------- Comment #2 from nick@cbcl.co.uk  2006-11-02 12:18 -------
While the proposed normalization does go some way towards the necessary
function conversion I don't think it does everything needed.

FunctionArgument(SequenceType) only implements 1 and 2 of the function
conversion rules listed in 3.1.5. Isn't something needed to add the promotion
in 3 and 4 into the normalization?

While I think the change to the text covers this, I'd have thought something
formal to cover type promotion would still be needed?

Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 12:18:44 UTC