- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:30:44 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3305 ------- Comment #2 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-05-31 14:30 ------- I think that in either case, doing such a grammar change is not an option due to it being too intrusive at this stage. I neither think it's necessary because parsers can handle sequence type/primary expressions appearing next to each other and already do so in other situations. Also, from what I can tell the 'in' keyword in either way appears between the type and value: for $i as xs:integer+ in (1, 2, 3) return $i Frans
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2006 14:30:49 UTC