- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:54:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3305 ------- Comment #1 from davidc@nag.co.uk 2006-05-31 13:54 ------- I think the spec is fairly clear at present that the type applies to the variable (ie to each individual item in a for clause) so saxon (and xq2xsl) have (currently) the correct interpretation. 3.8.1 says: ...Each variable bound in a for or let clause may have an optional type declaration, which is a type declared using the syntax in 2.5.3 SequenceType Syntax. If the type of a value bound to the variable does not match the declared type... The change to instead type the sequence would as you point out be more expressive as it would give sensible meanings for the cardinality indicators, but if that change were made I think the position of the as clause would need to move for $i in (1,2,3) as xs:integer* so that "as" keeps its role of separating the value and the type. David
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2006 13:54:11 UTC