- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 08:16:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3173 ------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-05-02 08:16 ------- >Why not simply require that all document nodes must be mapped in available-documents? Because it runs against existing practice. (A) Existing APIs such as JAXP and System.Xml.Xsl allow you to supply a DOM Document as the value of a parameter or as the principal input to a transformation, and there is not necessarily any URI that will return that document. (B) The "mapping" (available-documents) is traditionally implemented by a user hook (called a URIResolver or XmlResolver) that takes a URI as input and returns a node as output; the mapping performed by such a user hook is not intrinsically reversible.
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 08:17:00 UTC