- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:32:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3305 ------- Comment #5 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-06-04 22:32 ------- Why not change the type declaration to apply to the binding sequence as a whole, instead of the items individually? As mentioned earlier, this makes the type declaration more powerfull since the user can control how the mapping(for/every/some) is run. That is, if it's run at least once, exactly once, or any amount. I can't see any drawbacks with going that route. I don't see any fundamental differences for implementors to implement it(but otoh, my experience is surely limited), nor do I find it more intrusive than changing the grammar. I would with interest read about potential drawbacks for letting the type declaration apply to the sequence as a whole.
Received on Sunday, 4 June 2006 22:32:17 UTC