- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:18:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3305 ------- Comment #4 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-06-04 22:18 ------- I think the spec is clear that you can write for $i as xs:integer* in (1 to 5) return ... and there seems to be no justification for Saxon rejecting this as an error. It's clear that the sequenceType applies to the value bound to the variable. This means that the occurrence indicator is redundant but not wrong. I don't think there is any good reason for the spec to allow an occurrence indicator here, however. It would be a straightforward change to the syntax to allow only an ItemType rather than a SequenceType, and I would personally be in favour of making this change. Michael Kay
Received on Sunday, 4 June 2006 22:18:33 UTC