- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:12:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2711 ------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org 2006-01-25 18:12 ------- Sigh...thanks for finding that error. With Michael Sperberg-McQueen's help, here's another (simpler, I think) pattern regex that doesn't have the problem you identified: (([^#]|#+[^\)#])*#*) All of the test cases (about 50 or 60) I've tried on this one seem to succeed. If you find an error on this, please report it and we'll keep on trying.
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 18:12:35 UTC