- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:51:48 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2766 ------- Additional Comments From pcase@crs.loc.gov 2006-01-25 14:51 ------- Thanks for raising this discrepancy Joaquin. Early on, in consultation with the I18n, we decided to use "words" not "tokens". It holds more meaning and is less obscure. I still feel strongly that we were right in that decision. We struggled, again with assistance from the I18n, to produce what I think is an excellent definition of the word "word". In Section 4 we use "TokenInfo" (and define it) and variables such as "$searchToken". I would prefer they be "WordInfo" and $searchWord", but can live with these. In Section 4 I see occurrences of token and search token. I would like to see these changed to word, $searchToken, or another variable name where appropriate. If we decide we need to keep the word "token" in Section 4, I agree it should be defined, defined as a word returned by a tokenizer used as a search operand. I think I am correct that a token is always a word? When we treat phrases, sentences, and paragraphs as single units we call them intervals, right?
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 14:51:54 UTC