- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:48:26 +0100
- To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>, <www-international@w3.org>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
* Michael Kay wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#C073 has "Publicly interchanged content
>> SHOULD NOT use codepoints in the private use area." Reference to and
>> use of are equivalent concepts here. You might well argue that SHOULD
>> NOT is not MUST NOT, conformance checkers are nevertheless going to
>> point out violations of the SHOULD NOT requirement
>
>I fail to see how a conformance checker is supposed to know whether the
>content is being publicly interchanged. I would think that most conformance
>checkers are likely to give the user the benefit of the doubt, or at least
>to provide options.
I'd assume it'd look like
WARNING: Publicly interchanged content SHOULD NOT
use codepoints in the private use area.
Educated users can then decide to ignore this.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 10:47:43 UTC