- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:06:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2944 ------- Additional Comments From per@bothner.com 2006-02-27 18:07 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Durations in XML Schema 1.0 are 6-tuples, which would suggest that > years-from-duration(P24M) (excuse the shorthand) should return zero; while in > XML schema 1.1, durations are 2-tuples, which would suggest that the same > function returns 2. I don't think that's a useful example. It seems that: fn:years-from-duration(xs:duration(LEXVALUE)) should always return the same as fn:years-from-duration(xs:yearMonthDuration(LEXVALUE)) whenever xs:yearMonthDuration(LEXVALUE) is well-defined. The tricky part is when you have a LEXVALUE with components such that it is neither a yearMonthDuration or a dayTimeDuration. But even here there it is well-defined - using the existing definition: fn:XXX-from-duration($arg) "Returns an xs:integer[or xs:decimal] representing the XXX component in the canonical lexical representation of the value of $arg." That pushes the issue to the "canonical lexical representation" - but that does appear to handle this case. (It would probably be cleaner to define "canonical lexical representation" in terms of fn:XXX-from-duration rather than vice versa, of course)
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 18:06:26 UTC