- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:03:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2792 ------- Additional Comments From mrys@microsoft.com 2006-02-01 22:03 ------- While this is not a valid type on an attribute, we should allow this expression since attribute(*, xs:anyType) matches the same nodes as attribute (*, xs:anySimpleType) according to our type matching rules. So I do not see a reason to be overly restrictive here....
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:03:55 UTC