- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:38:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4031 ------- Comment #6 from mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com 2006-12-15 18:38 ------- Thanks that you would be making these changes in the spec. I have few further comments please. Please read my response below your comments. (In reply to comment #5) > Thank you for this comment. The Working Group decided to make the following > editorial changes to section 17: > 1. Before the quoted sentence "A final result tree is also created implicitly > if no xsl:result-document instruction is evaluated, ...", add "As explained in > [section 2.4], ...". This looks good to me. But I think, you mean Section 19, and not Section 17. > 2. Change the sentence "The output of a transformation is a set of zero or more > final result trees." to read "The output of a successful transformation is a > set of one or more final result trees." I think this is ok, if the result of transformation is a tree, which can be serialized as XML. Does the term final result tree is right, if output is plain text (e.g. when produced by stylesheet instruction <xsl:output method="text" /> (and not XML) ) ? > We assume this response meets your concerns. > Michael Kay > for the XSL Working Group
Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 18:39:02 UTC