- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:01:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 ------- Comment #3 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-12-04 16:01 ------- Yes, I think David is right on all three counts: (a) the ambiguity between the act of normalizing and the state of being normalized (b) the intended meaning that the processor should perform no normalization (c) the resulting outcome, that is the possibility that the result will not be in normal form
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 16:01:30 UTC