[Bug 4024] ST-WhereExpr001 should not be expected to fail?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4024





------- Comment #7 from per@bothner.com  2006-12-01 08:47 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
That makes sense and that is why I suggested in #5 to make the dynamic
semantics of fn:boolean((NODE, .., ATOMIC ...)) unspecified, allowing
implementations to return either true or error.

But in any case, the testsuite should be fixed to allow but not require an
error.

Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 08:47:18 UTC