W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > December 2006

[Bug 4024] ST-WhereExpr001 should not be expected to fail?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:47:03 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Gq42x-0000Tf-1S@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4024





------- Comment #7 from per@bothner.com  2006-12-01 08:47 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
That makes sense and that is why I suggested in #5 to make the dynamic
semantics of fn:boolean((NODE, .., ATOMIC ...)) unspecified, allowing
implementations to return either true or error.

But in any case, the testsuite should be fixed to allow but not require an
error.
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 08:47:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:16 UTC