- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:17:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |simeon@us.ibm.com
AssignedTo|andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com |carmelo@nist.gov
------- Comment #1 from andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com 2006-08-03 18:17 -------
You've made a good case for adding XPTY0004.
I'm less convinced that XPST0001 should be removed. As you say, the error
description says "some component has not been assigned a value". Without
thinking, I had expanded this error to include missing definitions within the
In-Scope Schema Definitions.
Perhaps Jerome will give us an opinion on whether XPST0001 should be retained.
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2006 18:19:32 UTC