- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:11:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1702 ------- Comment #5 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-04-18 13:11 ------- Michael: I've been going back on forth on this. I ended up thinking that: (1) ideally having complete normalization rules for module would be probably more intuitive and clear, (2) there is nothing broken right now and we do not use the productions you mention, and it is touching on a pretty complex part of the spec. At such a late point in the game, I think that fixing the editorial problem is what we are trying to do. So I opted for the option that is less intrusive (and less work!). Hope it makes sense. - Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 13:12:19 UTC