W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2006

[Bug 1610] don't environments behave like a stack? why not say so?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:15:56 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FTR9Q-0007X4-M4@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1610


mff@research.att.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #2 from mff@research.att.com  2006-04-11 22:15 -------
The paragraph immediately following the one below 
already addresses this point:

 <p>Updating an environment creates a copy of the original
      environment and overrides any previous binding that might exist
      for the same name and the same component in that
      environment. Updating the environment is used to capture the
      <emph>scope</emph> of a symbol (e.g., for variables, namespace
      prefixes, etc). For instance, in the following expression</p>
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2006 22:15:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:11 UTC