- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:20:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3072 ------- Comment #5 from frans.englich@telia.com 2006-04-04 16:20 ------- Ashok, not as I see it. It would counter act changes previously done concerning this(see bug #1526, for example). I neither see how it would make sense; anyAtomicType is an abstract type with no value space. Regards, Frans
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 16:21:02 UTC