- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:42:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1479 mike@saxonica.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-05-22 16:42 ------- Thanks for the comment. We should really change this from saying the attribute must be of type ID to saying that the is-id property in the data model must be set. (The existing text seems to be unchanged since 1.0). (This property is automatically set for the xml:id attribute; but this note is only talking about the id attribute). The other oddity about this paragraph is the reference to the id() function. In the context of embedded stylesheet modules, what users really want to know is whether they can use the id value as a fragment identifier, not whether they can use it in a call to the id() function. I suspect the 1.0 text avoiding discussing this because the meaning of a fragment identifier technically depends on the media type of the document containing the embedded stylesheet, and as far as I know we *still* don't have an official spec that says bare ID values are legitimate as fragment identfiers for the application/XML media type. If the problem were confined to changing the note to permit identification using xml:id, I would treat it as editorial, but because of the interaction with media types, I think the comment probably needs WG discussion. Michael Kay
Received on Sunday, 22 May 2005 16:42:13 UTC